AG seeks judge’s help to make government reveal corruption case settlement

B.C.’s auditor general cannot fulfill his duty if he is blocked from seeing the deal that paid $6 million in legal bills for two government ...

B.C.’s auditor general cannot fulfill his duty if he is blocked from seeing the deal that paid $6 million in legal bills for two government aides who pleaded guilty to corruption, the BC Supreme Court heard Monday.

A five-day hearing before Chief Justice Robert Bauman began with opening statements by Louis Zivot, representing Auditor General John Doyle. The government has refused to show Doyle the indemnity agreement, claiming it is protected by solicitor–client privilege.

Zivot said the reluctance of the government to hand over the documents greatly hinders Doyle’s role as the watchdog over the public purse. “He should be given all the tools,” Zivot said.

Doyle wants to know why the government ignored policy and paid legal costs for Dave Basi and Bob Virk after their surprise guilty plea on October 18, 2010. They claimed their innocence for more than six years over allegations they sold confidential government information to a bidder for BC Rail. Doyle is working on a report about government indemnification policies.

Zivot said Doyle’s performance audit has three objectives:

  • to find out whether the legal and administrative framework is based on sound reasoning and transparency,
  • to determine whether the framework is effectively managed and appropriately authorized; and
  • to establish whether current reporting requirements are sufficient.

"The auditor general doesn't want to get into a debate every time, whether there is privilege or an issue of privilege,” Zivot said.

If he has to, then “his audits will be significantly impeded,” Zivot said.

John van Dongen, who quit the B.C. Liberal caucus in March, was granted intervenor status in the hearings.

“The process of special indemnity appears to be something of an ad hoc process,” van Dongen said. “There is a lack of accountability and checks and balances.”

BMackin@biv.com

@bobmackin

comments powered by Disqus

Also Read

More From Law & Politics

These corporate writs were filed with the BC Supreme Court registry in Vancouver. Information is derived from notices of civil claim. Civil claims have yet ...

Read Article

Ebook software firm claims former employees swiped source code as part of a conspiracy to set up a competitor

Read Article

B.C. health care advocates are calling on the provincial government to investigate the full extent of extra billing at private clinics after a Supreme Court ...

Read Article

Vancouver needs more cabs, but whether Uber will be part of an expansion is still unknown

Read Article

The British Columbia government is doing a bangup job of providing the public information – just not necessarily the information the public wants, when it ...

Read Article

Subscribe to our mailing lists

* indicates required

Newsletters

×