Van Dongen’s lawyer adds weight to AG’s case in corruption settlement hearing

The ability of MLAs to do their jobs will be “severely impaired” if the government blocks Auditor General John Doyle from examining the deal that ...

The ability of MLAs to do their jobs will be “severely impaired” if the government blocks Auditor General John Doyle from examining the deal that paid $6 million in legal bills for two government aides who pleaded guilty to corruption, ex-Liberal John van Dongen’s lawyer told the BC Supreme Court Wednesday.

Roger McConchie added that the indemnity agreement should only stay a secret if the men in question repaid the $6m fees in full, “extinguishing the need for an audit.”

McConchie was speaking to a five-day hearing before Chief Justice Robert Bauman, at which the Auditor General’s lawyer Louis Zivot argued on Monday that Doyle cannot fulfill his duty if he is blocked from seeing the deal.

McConchie said yesterday, “At the end of the day, the actual indemnitor under the legal fee indemnity agreements at issue in this case is the taxpayer, who depends on his or her MLA to hold the government accountable for expenditures from the Consolidated Revenue Fund [general revenue].”

Van Dongen, who quit the Liberal caucus in March over the issue and joined the B.C. Conservatives, was granted intervenor status and is supporting Auditor John Doyle’s quest to see the indemnity deal that contravened government policy by absolving Dave Basi and Bob Virk of their $6 million legal bill. The former government aides made surprise corruption guilty pleas October 18, 2010, related to the 2003 sale of BC Rail to CN.

McConchie said that Freedom of Information laws and the Legal Profession Act both favour disclosure of the agreement, which the government says is protected by solicitor/client privilege.

“By agreeing to accept public funds to pay their legal bills, the persons indemnified must be taken to waive privilege with respect to an audit by the Auditor General, having regard to the public objectives of the Auditor General’s statute,” McConchie said. “Further, or alternatively, the persons indemnified could, it is submitted, preserve the privilege over their legal accounts by repaying the indemnities in full, thereby extinguishing the need for an audit.”

The provisions of the Auditor General Act, McConchie said, “read as a whole, clearly contemplate, require and authorize, by necessary implication and unavoidable inference, access to the legal fee invoices.”

The five-day hearing ends Friday, but closing statements won’t be heard until December 3 and 4 because of Chief Justice Bauman’s schedule.

BMackin@biv.com

@bobmackin

comments powered by Disqus

More from Law & Politics

Who's getting sued: August 23, 2016

These corporate claims were filed with the BC Supreme Court registry in Vancouver. Information is derived from notices of civil claim. Civil claims have yet ...

Read Article

Lawsuit of the week: Defective lock stranded woman in bathroom for 30 ...

A Burnaby condo owner is suing Embassy Development Corp. and others, claiming that a locking mechanism installed in her suite malfunctioned 

Read Article

Surrey Ponzi schemer gets jail time

Roberto Castano sentenced 27 months in prison for fraud

Read Article

Lawsuit of the week: Flood of lawsuits hits Imperial Metals Corp. in ...

Businesses and First Nations are suing Imperial Metals Corp. and several other defendants over the August 2014 tailings pond dam breach that released more than ...

Read Article

Who's getting sued: August 16, 2016

These corporate claims were filed with the BC Supreme Court registry in Vancouver. Information is derived from notices of civil claim. Civil claims have yet ...

Read Article

Subscribe to our mailing lists

* indicates required

Newsletters

* You can modify your newsletter subscriptions at the bottom of any newsletter you receive.
×