First Nations vow “all litigation, all the time” over oil sands

Brewing disputes with First Nations, claims of mercury pollution and increasing challenges for delivering oil to distant markets are only some of the challenges Canada's ...

Brewing disputes with First Nations, claims of mercury pollution and increasing challenges for delivering oil to distant markets are only some of the challenges Canada's oil sands will face this year, a report released Thursdayshows.

With more markets opening up to Alberta crude oil, and pipelines headed east, west and south, producers will have plenty of options in choosing a market, according to the study, produced by U.S.-based Industrial Info Resources (IIR).

The problem is, analysts warn, there are too many issues surrounding the province's oil sands, from simmering disputes between natives and the local and federal governments to growing concerns over the environmental impact of mining the deposits.

In the last year and a half, the federal and provincial authorities have rewritten the book on resource development. Everything from how First Nations should be consulted, to land use to oil sands monitoring and the basic regulations for environmental assessment have changed.

Ottawa even said in October that it would invest about $24 million in a two-year international ad campaign to counter "intense and sustained public relations" attacks against Alberta's oil sands.

While official sources claim the new ground rules are a huge improvement in terms of efficiency and transparency, Canadian Press reports aboriginals are preparing a long list of lawsuits that are either now, or soon to be, before the courts.

Natives say virtually every one of the many recent policy changes violates their rights and ignores their recommendations.

"All litigation, all the time, is what I see on the horizon," Larry Innes, lawyer for the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, was quoted as saying.

Oil sands producers will also have to deal with environmental worries, which deepened last month after Environment Canada found that mercury levels around the oil sands were up to 16 times higher than "background" quantities for the region.

Environmentalists say that extracting oil from the sands will lead to an increase in carbon emissions, the destruction of the land, water contamination and health problems for Canadians.

The debate over the tar sands crossed over into the U.S., when energy company TransCanada proposed building the Keystone XL pipeline to transport crude oil for refining and distribution across the border.

While the mercury levels found around the sands are still lower than in other parts of Canada (notably around coal plants and incinerators), mercury is particularly worrisome to environmentalists because it can bioaccumulate, meaning it becomes more concentrated as it works its way up the food chain.

comments powered by Disqus

More from Mining & Energy

Workers block First Majestic Silver’s Mexico mine

Read Article

Panel recommends breakup of Canada’s National Energy Board

Future pipeline debates might be about light oil from Alberta, B.C., not oilsands bitumen

Read Article

Thinking small pays off for liquefied natural gas firm

Multibillion-dollar export projects stalled, but smaller companies developing local market

Read Article

Coal transfer facility challenged in federal Court

Court is asked to overturn Vancouver Port Authority's approval of Fraser Surrey Docks coal project

Read Article

First Quantum Minerals to commission $5.5b Panama copper project in just months

Read Article

Subscribe to our mailing lists

* indicates required


* You can modify your newsletter subscriptions at the bottom of any newsletter you receive.