Clark’s BC Liberals score high marks on economy

Since 2013 the economy went from ‘middling’ to leader of the pack, but macro-economics, not government, the main contributor to B.C.’s fortunes
BC Finance Minister Mike de Jong brought in B.C.'s fourth balanced, surplus budget in February.

In the weeks leading up to the 2013 provincial election, B.C.’s economy was “muddling along” with low job growth, “muted” consumer spending, and an expected gross domestic product growth rate of 2.3%.

Fast-forward four years, and the BC Liberal government is heading into an election when the B.C. economy is firing on all cylinders, with record exports of $40 billion and annual GDP growth rates of 3.3% in 2014, 2015 and 2016.

Much of B.C.’s recent economic growth has been concentrated in Vancouver, where a hot housing market has primed the construction sector.

Vancouver had record job creation in 2016 (60,000), record new housing starts (27,000) and a GDP growth rate of 4%, according to the Conference Board of Canada.

Although housing has been a major economic driver for Vancouver, its high-tech, tourism and film industries have also posted strong growth. B.C.’s agri-food and seafood sectors have also broken export records for four years in a row now, hitting $3.8 billion in 2016.

“We were a middling performer back in 2013 … and in the last few years we’ve really been at the top of the heap,” said Jock Finlayson, chief policy officer for the Business Council of BC (BCBC).

But much of B.C.’s growth has been due to macroeconomic factors beyond government control, like commodity prices, interest rates, market demand and a low Canadian dollar.

“The type of growth we’ve seen in B.C. since 2013 would have happened irrespective of policy decisions made by government,” said Rob Gillezeau, assistant professor of economics at the University of Victoria. “Our growth has been driven by the housing sector, and that can’t last forever.

“Big picture, the economy has done fine, and it’s done fine regardless of the decisions of this government.”

But Finlayson said the government deserves some credit for its fiscal management, its taxation policies and its focus on economic diversification, which has helped shield B.C. from the kinds of shocks Alberta and Saskatchewan have suffered.

“I would give the government pretty good marks overall on their stewardship of the economy, recognizing they can’t take credit for all the positive things directly,” Finlayson said. “But they’ve certainly made a contribution.”

B.C. has produced four surplus budgets and maintained a triple-A credit rating, while every other province in Canada, except Quebec, has been producing deficit budgets.

“I think overall our provincial government has been practising great business fundamentals: balancing the budget, investing in a more diversified economy,” said BC Chamber of Commerce president Val Litwin.

The central job creation policy of the BC Liberals in 2013 was the promise of a new liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry.

Had the government made good on its promises, hundreds – if not thousands – of workers would have been on site by now building new gas pipelines and LNG plants in Kitimat and Prince Rupert.

But a deep and prolonged oil price plunge forced oil and gas companies like Petronas and Shell to defer final investment decisions. Only the smaller Woodfibre LNG plant in Squamish has received a final investment decision.

However, Litwin does not see the Liberal government’s policies on LNG as a total failure. Since 2012, an estimated $20 billion has been invested in B.C.’s natural gas sector in new gas wells, pipelines and gas processing plants. While some of that investment has been driven by the Montney formation’s natural gas liquids – which have value irrespective of an LNG market – much of the investment has been to lay the foundation for LNG.

“Even before we have a plethora of operating LNG terminals, billions have been invested in the B.C. economy to prepare for the industry,” Litwin said. “And that is a provincial initiative. The province needs to be given credit for that. There has been an economic lift there.”

Major industries like forestry and mining tend to be affected more by commodity prices and global market demand than they are by provincial policies. It’s small business where provincial policies on regulations and taxation tend to have the greatest impact.

Litwin gives the Liberal government full marks for its red tape reduction strategy, which has made it easier for mobile businesses – contractors, for example – to get business licences when they move from one municipality to another. He also applauds the establishment in late 2012 of an auditor general for municipal government.

And though immigration is a federal matter, Litwin also credits the provincial government for lobbying Ottawa on behalf of business when the federal government made changes to the temporary foreign worker program, which hit the hospitality and tourism industries particularly hard.

“The province really stepped up to the plate and did a lot of work working in tandem (with business) to co-ordinate on policy recommendations to the federal government to make it more friendly for the tourism and hospitality industry here in B.C.,” Litwin said. “And that’s a big part of our economy. The province was an incredible partner in pushing for some of these updated recommendations that we’ve seen come down from Ottawa.”

More broadly speaking, Finlayson said B.C. businesses have also benefited from provincial government financial management that has kept various levels of taxation in check.

“B.C., I think, is recognized as having the strongest controls over government spending of any province in the country in the past few years.” 

nbennett@biv.com

PST remains biggest tax bugbear for B.C. businesses

Like a bad penny, the provincial sales tax returned to B.C. in April 2013, just ahead of the provincial election, after the provincial government was forced by a citizens’ referendum led by former premier Bill Vander Zalm to scrap its harmonized sales tax.

Ever since, B.C. businesses have chafed under the sales tax and have lobbied for its reform.

“Moving back to the PST from the HST was very bad for incentives to invest in B.C. for companies,” said Kevin Milligan, a professor with the Vancouver School of Economics at the University of British Columbia. “And I really think we need to have a plan to improve that environment for investment in B.C.”

Charles Lammam, director of fiscal studies for the Fraser Institute, agrees. B.C.’s income and corporate taxes are competitive. But he said the PST on business inputs deters business investment.

“This highly antiquated and damaging tax causes the overall tax rate on investment to be very high,” he said.

To date, despite recommendations for reforms from the government’s Commission on Tax Competitiveness, the B.C. government has only tinkered with tax reform. Most recently, in the last provincial budget, it cut Medical Services Plan (MSP) premiums and the PST on electricity sales in half.

The budget also reduced the corporate income tax rate to 2% from the previous 2.5% – which is still short of the 1.5% that the BC Liberals had promised in 2013.

Otherwise, the Liberal government has generally lived up to the promises it made on taxation in 2013, including the promise to bring personal income tax rates back down to 14.7% on the upper tax bracket after temporarily raising them to 16.8%.

Generally speaking, business groups give the Liberal government high marks for its tax policies, including a continued freeze on the carbon tax at $30 per tonne for the foreseeable future.

“Some of the laser-focused tax credits, I think, are very helpful and are encouraging investment in business,” said BC Chamber of Commerce president Val Litwin. “And we do still have one of the most deeply competitive tax structures in Canada.”

Added Milligan: “The biggest thing to note is that, in part because of the carbon tax revenue, we’re able to have, by many measures, the lowest personal and corporate taxes in Canada.”

Because the carbon tax is revenue neutral, it requires taxes elsewhere to drop when it’s raised, which explains how the government was able to lower income tax rates without losing tax revenue.

While B.C. might have some of the lowest business and income taxes in the country, it also has hidden taxes, like MSP premiums, which have soared in recent years. Some employers cover their employees’ MSP premiums.

BC Hydro rates have also risen sharply: 27% over the past four years. They rose another 3.5% on April 1.

Perhaps the most newsworthy new tax measure implemented in B.C. since the last election was the foreign-buyer tax on real estate.

Introduced in 2016, it was intended to cool Vancouver’s overheated real estate market. The new tax adds a 15% premium to the property transfer tax for non-resident foreign buyers who buy real estate in Metro Vancouver. The tax had a marginal impact on average home prices, according to the Bank of Montreal, which reported that average prices fell only 10% in February 2017 compared with February 2016, while the number of sales fell dramatically in that period (42%).

The tax was intended to address a problem of foreign buyers pushing up housing prices and creating zombie homes (empty condos and houses bought by wealthy foreign buyers who don’t live here).

But it has had unintended consequences. Employers have warned the tax will make it harder to recruit professionals from abroad because it makes buying a home in Vancouver even more expensive for foreign professionals such as doctors, academics and engineers.

Earlier this year, the provincial government announced it would exempt foreign workers with work permits from the 15% tax.

One important new tax the Liberal government introduced that has received little attention was a special tax on liquefied natural gas (LNG) sales.

In October 2014, the provincial government announced a new two-tiered tax for LNG exports. The tax was criticized as possibly thwarting the nascent industry because LNG producers would already pay taxes on natural gas.

The tax was originally proposed to start at 1.5% of net operating income once an LNG plant was in production and would rise as high as 7% once all capital investments were paid off.

But after former Petronas CEO Shamsul Abbas warned that the tax could delay the industry for several years, the provincial government scaled the second-tier tax rate to 3.5%.  However, the industry has been delayed anyway.
comments powered by Disqus

More from Law & Politics

British Columbia 2017 provincial election map

Interactive election map showing the 2017 candidates and the 2013 results

Read Article

Who's getting sued: April 25, 2017

These corporate claims were filed with the BC Supreme Court registry in Vancouver. Information is derived from notices of civil claim. Civil claims have yet ...

Read Article

Lawsuit of the week: City of Vancouver goes to court to quash ...

The City of Vancouver is taking the minister of environment and the minister of natural gas development to court to quash the environmental assessment certificate ...

Read Article

Mixed reviews for NDP platform among B.C. business groups

Some NDP policies welcomed, but unfunded costs of party’s promises raise concerns

Read Article

Charity first for global business development boss

Q&A: Vancouver-Point Grey Liberal candidate sees need for innovation, technology investment

Read Article

Subscribe to our mailing lists

* indicates required

Newsletters

* You can modify your newsletter subscriptions at the bottom of any newsletter you receive.
×